Internet Access Options

Internet Access Options
SIPOC map auto generated by the ProcessHorizon web app

The main Internet Access options for home use are as follows:

  • Copper DSL is the most limited in terms of performance, particularly for high-demand tasks like streaming or gaming. Key performance metrics: Download: 10-50 Mbps, Upload: 1-10 Mbps, Latency: 30-60 ms, Stability: Low, Future-Proofing: Poor
  • Cable (Coaxial) Internet Access involves the delivery of internet service through coaxial cable networks, typically provided by ISPs and cable TV providers and offers relatively high-speed internet access. Key performance metrics: Download speed: 50 Mbps to 1 Gbps, Upload speed: 10 Mbps to 50 Mbps, Latency: 10–30 ms, Stability: Generally high, with occasional outages due to external interference, Future-Proofing: Moderate (good speed, but limited by coaxial technology and network capacity)
  • FTTC (Fiber to the Cabinet) + 10m Copper provides much better performance than copper alone, especially with fast downloads and decent uploads, but it’s still limited compared to Full Fiber. Key performance metrics: Download: 90-300 Mbps, Upload: 30-50 Mbps, Latency: 10-20 ms, Stability: High, Future-Proofing: Limited
  • Full Fiber is the top choice for maximum speed, low latency, and future-proofing, ideal for anyone with high-demand internet needs. Key performance metrics: Download: 300 Mbps–10+ Gbps, Upload: Symmetrical, Latency: 1-10 ms, Stability: Very High, Future-Proofing: Excellent
  • Starlink is a great option for rural areas, offering decent speeds and reliability for users without access to cable or fiber, but with some weather-related instability. Key performance metrics: Download: 50-250 Mbps, Upload: 10-50 Mbps, Latency: 20-50 ms, Stability: Moderate (weather-dependent), Future-Proofing: Improving, but not as good as fiber
  • Mobile (4G/5G) Cellular network data (via mobile phone or hotspot) for mobile users, On-the-Go Key performance metrics: 10 Mbps–1 Gbps

Read more

Integrated Quality Management within GRC: A Foundation for Responsible Agentic AI

Integrated Quality Management within GRC: A Foundation for Responsible Agentic AI

Governance defines what should be achieved. Risk Management determines what could go wrong. Compliance establishes what must be respected. Quality Management ensures that processes and their outcomes consistently fulfill requirements & intended objectives. Together, they establish an integrated management system for responsible human & AI-driven enterprise operations. Event-driven SIPOC model

By Peter Haenni